Mass Claims 2024 nr. 1

Adjudicating Asbestos Claims In California and England:

Jo-Lynne Lee1

A Comparative Study

Asbestos injury litigation is "the longest-running mass tort in U.S. history."2 It has continuously and substantially impacted the California trial courts.3   This study,4 comparing the judicial approaches to asbestos litigation in England5 and California was prompted by demographic data reflecting that despite the five-fold greater mesothelioma deathrate in Britain than in the U.S.,6 the English courts devote dramatically less judicial time and resources to the management and resolution of asbestos claims than their counterparts in California.

Docket data reflecting the enormous resources expended on asbestos-related cases in California also suggest the utility of a comparative study.  Asbestos-related claims comprise less than 1% of the civil dockets in California,7 yet in those trial courts affected, there is one full-time judge solely dedicated to pre-trial management of these cases and additional judges called upon to try...

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Verder in dit artikel:

A Comparative Study

1. Brief History of Asbestos and Its Relationship to Cancer

1.1. Old Asbestos – New Exposure

1.2. A New Frontier – Talc Litigation 

2. The Right, or Not, to a Jury Trial

2.1. The Judicial College Guidelines 

3. The Parties and the Complaints: England v California

3.1. The Parties – Employers and Everyone Else

3.2. The Causes of Action – Product Liability

3.3. The Claims for Relief: Punitive Damages

4. Joint and Serveral Liability

5. Pre-Trial Proceedings: the Mesothelioma List and OSC Procedure

6. Disclosure Versus Discovery: England Versus California 

6.1. Sequence and Timing

6.2. Scope of Discoverable Evidence

6.3. Oral Depositions

6.4. Discovery in Talc Cases

7. Compensation and Benefits

7.1. Compensation and Benefits – England

7.2. Compensation and Benefits – California

7.3. California Workers' Compensation

7.4. Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts

7.5. Comparing English and American Compensation Systems

8. Concluding Remarks

Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Artikel
Auteurs
Jo-Lynne Lee1
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:MC/18281

Gerelateerde inhoud

Vrij gevonden op trefwoorden:

asbestos litigation, comparative analysis, England and Wales, California

Verder in 2024 nr.1

 Bundling of follow-on damages claims – an efficient way to litigate in the Netherlands?

Private enforcement actions are often brought in the Netherlands as mass claims. Claimants do not – and cannot (yet) – use the procedure for collective actions provided for in the Dutch...

 To Settle or Not to Settle; That's the Question

An Economic Analysis of the Factors Determining the Settlement of Mass Damage Disputes and Implications for Legal Practice 1. Introduction In many cases, large numbers of victims have suffered or c...

 Adjudicating Asbestos Claims In California and England:

A Comparative Study Asbestos injury litigation is "the longest-running mass tort in U.S. history."[2] It has continuously and substantially impacted the California trial courts.[3]  This study,[4] ...

 Navigating Current Issues and Future of Collective Redress:

Key Takeaways from the 2024 Global Class Actions and Mass Tort Conference On 23 and 24 May 2024, the Perfect Law Global Class Actions and Mass Tort Conference took place in London. This year's conf...

 Country reports

England and Wales, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland   England and Wales Anna Dannreuther, Gladuela Lawrence  Case law Commission Recovery Limited...