Mass Claims 2021 nr. 2

Class Actions in Portugal:

Miguel Sousa Ferro2

The little regime that could1

The Portuguese class action regime is unique and particularly claimant friendly. It is often overlooked, internationally, that Portugal is one of the few EU jurisdictions with an opt-out class action regime. At the same time, when it comes to reaction to unlawful practices causing mass damage, the regime has hardly ever been used and has almost never been successful. Portugal is, therefore, an important case study to understand the factors that can facilitate or stand in the way of the effective use of a class action regime.
This paper is meant, first and foremost, for practitioners and policy makers. It succinctly describes the legal framework for civil class actions in Portugal. It then provides an overview of the practical reality of class actions in Portugal, including the recent watershed change that has occurred in the use of this mechanism.

1. Origins and legal basis

1.1. Origins...

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Verder in dit artikel:

The little regime that could[1]

1. Origins and legal basis

1.1. Origins

1.2. Constitutional right

1.3. General and special rules on popular action

1.4. Characteristics of civil popular actions

2. Reality of class actions in Portugal

2.1. Initial overview

2.2. Mass damages claims

2.3. Consumer and regulatory law cases

2.4. Antitrust cases

2.5. Securities cases

2.6. GDPR cases

2.7. Recent trends and funding

3. Conclusion

Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Artikel
Auteurs
Miguel Sousa Ferro2
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:MC/17029

Gerelateerde inhoud

Vrij gevonden op trefwoorden:

opt-out, Portugal, Popular actions

Verder in 2021 nr.2

 Foreword

Procedures for collective redress of civil law wrongs are not new. Representative procedures have been available in numerous countries around the world for a long time, and in some parts of Europe ...

 Class Action and Litigation Funding Reform:

Lessons from Down Under? As countries in the European Union grapple with the implementation of the Representative Actions Directive the class action regime in Australia is approaching its 30th anni...

 Bundling of Claims by way of Assignment in Germany

1. Dealing with Multiple Claims in Germany 1.1. Multiple Parties In line with other legal systems, civil procedure in Germany starts from the model of one plaintiff litigating a particular claim ag...

 Class Actions in Portugal:

The little regime that could[1] The Portuguese class action regime is unique and particularly claimant friendly. It is often overlooked, internationally, that Portugal is one of the few EU jurisdic...

 Quantifying damages in cartel cases:

the Spanish Courts' approach to the Trucks cartel Although Spain does not enjoy the tradition of other jurisdictions such as the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany in the field of Competit...

 Lloyd v Google [2021] UK SC 50:

a setback in the Supreme Court for collective redress in the UK Those familiar with Competition law in the United Kingdom will be aware that collective proceedings before the Competition Appeal Tri...

 RH v AB Volvo: A Call for Centralized and Specialized Courts in the Midst of Jurisdictional Dispersion

Case Note: C-30/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:604 On 15 July 2021, the CJEU handed down its first judgment on a string of preliminary questions which have been referred to it by the Spanish commercial courts ...

 Country Reports1

Belgium Hakim Boularbah and Maria-Clara Van den Bossche Case law Brussels Court of Appeal's judgment of 14 April 2021, Belgian Consumer Ombudsman Service v. six energy suppliers (2019/AR/1763) ...