Mass Claims 2021 nr. 2

RH v AB Volvo: A Call for Centralized and Specialized Courts in the Midst of Jurisdictional Dispersion

Paul Hitchings1

Case Note: C-30/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:604

On 15 July 2021, the CJEU handed down its first judgment on a string of preliminary questions which have been referred to it by the Spanish commercial courts pursuant to Article 267 TFEU in the context of the so-called "Trucks Litigation". This first referral was made by Madrid Commercial Court nº 2 pursuant to an order of 23 December 2019 and relates to the interpretation of Article 7(2) of the Brussels I bis Regulation in connection with claims for damages arising out of a competition law infringement.2 The case is interesting, not only for its ruling on the scope and meaning of Article 7(2) in competition cases, but above all for what it says about the organization of national court systems, and the possibility, need even, for centralized and specialized competition courts in this technically complex area of law.

1. Background

It is worth understanding the context within which the Volvo

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Verder in dit artikel:

Case Note: C-30/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:604

1. Background

2. The issue in the case

3. The Court's ruling on Article 7(2)

4. The issue of specialized courts

Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Artikel
Auteurs
Paul Hitchings1
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:MC/17032

Gerelateerde inhoud

Vrij gevonden op trefwoorden:

Volvo, ECJ, 7(2) Brussels I Bis, territorial competence

    Geen gerelateerde artikelen gevonden.

Verder in 2021 nr.2

 Foreword

Procedures for collective redress of civil law wrongs are not new. Representative procedures have been available in numerous countries around the world for a long time, and in some parts of Europe ...

 Class Action and Litigation Funding Reform:

Lessons from Down Under? As countries in the European Union grapple with the implementation of the Representative Actions Directive the class action regime in Australia is approaching its 30th anni...

 Bundling of Claims by way of Assignment in Germany

1. Dealing with Multiple Claims in Germany 1.1. Multiple Parties In line with other legal systems, civil procedure in Germany starts from the model of one plaintiff litigating a particular claim ag...

 Class Actions in Portugal:

The little regime that could[1] The Portuguese class action regime is unique and particularly claimant friendly. It is often overlooked, internationally, that Portugal is one of the few EU jurisdic...

 Quantifying damages in cartel cases:

the Spanish Courts' approach to the Trucks cartel Although Spain does not enjoy the tradition of other jurisdictions such as the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany in the field of Competit...

 Lloyd v Google [2021] UK SC 50:

a setback in the Supreme Court for collective redress in the UK Those familiar with Competition law in the United Kingdom will be aware that collective proceedings before the Competition Appeal Tri...

 RH v AB Volvo: A Call for Centralized and Specialized Courts in the Midst of Jurisdictional Dispersion

Case Note: C-30/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:604 On 15 July 2021, the CJEU handed down its first judgment on a string of preliminary questions which have been referred to it by the Spanish commercial courts ...

 Country Reports1

Belgium Hakim Boularbah and Maria-Clara Van den Bossche Case law Brussels Court of Appeal's judgment of 14 April 2021, Belgian Consumer Ombudsman Service v. six energy suppliers (2019/AR/1763) ...