Mass Claims 2021 nr. 2

Quantifying damages in cartel cases:

Gustavo Andres Martin Martin1

the Spanish Courts' approach to the Trucks cartel

Although Spain does not enjoy the tradition of other jurisdictions such as the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany in the field of Competition Law private enforcement, this does not mean that it lacks any kind of experience. The purpose of this contribution is to establish the general framework of the criteria being used by the Spanish courts in cartel cases. For that purpose, I consider the decisions handed down in the well-known "trucks cartel", given that it is the European jurisdiction where most judgments have until now been adopted and that the trucks cartel has led to most decisions in relation to the determination of damages for antitrust offences in Spain.  

1. Introduction

By two decisions of 19 July 2016 and 27 September 2017,2 the European Commission brought to an end a hybrid procedure that resulted in the sanctioning of the main truck manufacturers in the EEA con...

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Verder in dit artikel:

the Spanish Courts' approach to the Trucks cartel

1. Introduction

2. Jurisprudential framework for the determination of harm in cartel cases in Spain

3. Judicial responses to the determination of damage in the trucks cartel

4. Brief analysis of the answers given by the Spanish Courts awarding damages: from the acceptance of the claimant's expert's report to the recourse to the court's decision

4.1. Full acceptance of the sum claimed

4.2. Partial award of the amount proposed by the applicant with 1/3 reduction

4.3. Judicial estimation of the damage

4.4. Conclusions

Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Artikel
Auteurs
Gustavo Andres Martin Martin1
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:MC/17030

Verder in 2021 nr.2

 Foreword

Procedures for collective redress of civil law wrongs are not new. Representative procedures have been available in numerous countries around the world for a long time, and in some parts of Europe ...

 Class Action and Litigation Funding Reform:

Lessons from Down Under? As countries in the European Union grapple with the implementation of the Representative Actions Directive the class action regime in Australia is approaching its 30th anni...

 Bundling of Claims by way of Assignment in Germany

1. Dealing with Multiple Claims in Germany 1.1. Multiple Parties In line with other legal systems, civil procedure in Germany starts from the model of one plaintiff litigating a particular claim ag...

 Class Actions in Portugal:

The little regime that could[1] The Portuguese class action regime is unique and particularly claimant friendly. It is often overlooked, internationally, that Portugal is one of the few EU jurisdic...

 Quantifying damages in cartel cases:

the Spanish Courts' approach to the Trucks cartel Although Spain does not enjoy the tradition of other jurisdictions such as the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany in the field of Competit...

 Lloyd v Google [2021] UK SC 50:

a setback in the Supreme Court for collective redress in the UK Those familiar with Competition law in the United Kingdom will be aware that collective proceedings before the Competition Appeal Tri...

 RH v AB Volvo: A Call for Centralized and Specialized Courts in the Midst of Jurisdictional Dispersion

Case Note: C-30/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:604 On 15 July 2021, the CJEU handed down its first judgment on a string of preliminary questions which have been referred to it by the Spanish commercial courts ...

 Country Reports1

Belgium Hakim Boularbah and Maria-Clara Van den Bossche Case law Brussels Court of Appeal's judgment of 14 April 2021, Belgian Consumer Ombudsman Service v. six energy suppliers (2019/AR/1763) ...