Mass Claims 2022 nr. 2

The role of class representatives in mass claims: Establishing the Class Representatives Network in the UK

Kate Wellington1

Opinion Piece

 

In 2015 a new Consumer Rights Act2 entered the statute books in the UK. It propelled the country's consumer rights framework into the modern era, bringing together a variety of hitherto disparate rules and regulations. But tucked away at the back of the Act, in Schedule 8 on page 118, was something altogether new for UK consumers. Schedule 8 – entitled "Private Actions in Competition Law" – introduced3 a collective redress mechanism under which claims relating to loss or damage caused by a breach of competition law could be joined together as opt-out collective proceedings, and determined in a specialist forum, the Competition Appeals Tribunal. Individuals whose claims were collated in this way would be referred to as a "class". Collective proceedings would be commenced and progressed by a class representative, whose role would be to ensure that proceedings were pursued in the best interests of class members. Seven years on, ...

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Verder in dit artikel:

Opinion Piece

1. The role of the class representative

2. Three challenges for class representatives

3. The need for a Class Representatives Network

4. The road ahead

Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Artikel
Auteurs
Kate Wellington1
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:MC/17570

Verder in 2022 nr.2

 Mass claims in competition law - a UK perspective

The first attempt by the United Kingdom to introduce a provision for collective actions for competition claims was a failure.    In 2002, the UK competition legislation was amended to enable a desi...

 Judge Siofra O'Leary, President of the European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg, on Protocol 16 of the European Convention of Human Rights

Interview   We are delighted to have the opportunity to discuss with you the advisory opinion procedure under Protocol 16 of the European Convention of Human Rights.   1. Maybe we cou...

 For Justice, Not Profit: Public Funding of Collective Redress

Third-party litigation funding (TPLF) is widely viewed outside of Canada and the United States as indispensable to a viable collective litigation regime. Australia, for example, has a robust TPLF i...

 Encountering Class Actions in Swedish Law and Society

Class actions in Sweden are not flourishing. This article examines why the oldest class action regime in Scandinavia has not developed into anything more than a peripheral addition to the Swedish l...

 Bundling of claims by way of assignment in Italy

Bundling of claims by assignment (the so-called assignment model) is rapidly emerging in the European Union ("EU") as the favorite alternative to group actions for damages (either collective or rep...

 The role of class representatives in mass claims: Establishing the Class Representatives Network in the UK

Opinion Piece   In 2015 a new Consumer Rights Act[2] entered the statute books in the UK. It propelled the country's consumer rights framework into the modern era, bringing together a variet...

 VEB v BP: Centralisation of special jurisdiction in case of purely financial damages resulting from misinformation spread on the secondary securities market

Case Note: C-709/19, ECLI:EU:C:2021:377   The judgment of the CJEU in VEB v BP confirms that the occurrence of purely financial loss in a bank account or investment account is in itself insu...

 Country reports

England and Wales, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain   England and Wales Anna Dannreuther and Jackie McArthur Case law Município de Mariana and others v BHP ...