Mass Claims An international journal with a European focus 2024 nr. 2

Public interest litigation in the Netherlands:

Marit Bosselaar, Irene Bloemen and Peter Sprietsma1

Developments on admissibility in class actions

Public interest litigation is on the rise, especially in the Netherlands. As a result, Dutch class actions case law is undergoing significant development. The distinction between 'public interest' and 'group' class actions has become increasingly important in Dutch case law, especially for determining the admissibility requirements that apply to the interest organisations instituting such class actions. Moreover, opinions vary in the Netherlands on whether interest organisations claiming to act on behalf of the public interest should be able to request the judiciary to decide on important societal issues in the first place. As a consequence, the debate on public interest litigation via class actions and the admissibility requirements applicable to the organisation instituting them does not only occur in case law and legal literature, but is increasingly also taking place in the Dutch parliament.

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Verder in dit artikel:

Developments on admissibility in class actions

1. Introduction

2. Class actions in the Netherlands: the background

2.1. Introduction to class actions in the Netherlands

2.2. The new Dutch statutory class actions regime: WAMCA

2.3. Testing the admissibility requirements

2.4. The statutory representativeness requirement

2.5. The representativeness requirement in practice

2.6. Conclusion: different views

3. The 'light' admissibility regime for in-scope class actions

3.1. Introduction to the light admissibility regime

3.2. The representativeness requirement under the light admissibility regime

4. The emergent differences between the 'public interest class action' and the 'group class action'

4.1. Differentiating between public interest class actions and group class actions

4.2. Practical examples of public interest class actions versus group class actions

4.3. The representativeness requirement and the distinction between the public interest class action and the group class action

4.4. Conclusion: not (yet) a clear distinction

5. The future of public interest litigation and class actions in the Netherlands

6. Conclusion 

Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Artikel
Auteurs
Marit Bosselaar, Irene Bloemen and Peter Sprietsma1
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:MC/18500

Gerelateerde inhoud

Vrij gevonden op trefwoorden:

public interest class action, group class action, admissibility requirements

    Geen gerelateerde artikelen gevonden.

Verder in 2024 nr.2

 Bidding Justice: A Market Approach for Governing Third-Party Litigation Funding in European Collective Actions

Collective actions function as natural monopolies. An empirical analysis of the Dutch collective action cases demonstrates that funding returns remain consistently high at around 25% regardless of ...

 "Fear and Loathing in Luxembourg"

Quantum and class certification in data privacy mass claims after the first ECJ and BGH decisions Data breaches frequently lead to mass claims. With the European Court of Justice (ECJ) finding that...

 Foreword

A wave of reforms has swept class action regimes in many parts of the world. By 2019, significant amendments were introduced in the so-called first and second generation class regimes, the United S...

 Capital Investor Model Proceedings in Germany under the revised Capital Markets Model Case Act

Capital investor model proceedings under the German Capital Markets Model Case Act are an accepted instrument of collective redress in mass disputes concerning capital investor claims. However, the...

 The Revised Class Action Regime in Belgium:

Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?[1] Belgium has had a (consumer) class action regime since 2014. The Law of 21 April 2024 implemented the 2020 Representative Actions Directive. Although the revisi...

 Public interest litigation in the Netherlands:

Developments on admissibility in class actions Public interest litigation is on the rise, especially in the Netherlands. As a result, Dutch class actions case law is undergoing significant developm...

 Country Reports

France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Portugal   France   Maria-Jose Azar-Baud  Legislation In 2020, as part of the fact-finding panel of the General Administration, Legi...