Mass Claims An international journal with a European focus 2024 nr. 2

"Fear and Loathing in Luxembourg"

Claudia Lea Beckmann and Dominik Hübler1

Quantum and class certification in data privacy mass claims after the first ECJ and BGH decisions

Data breaches frequently lead to mass claims. With the European Court of Justice (ECJ) finding that there is no "seriousness threshold" for claims and the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) confirming that pure loss of control can constitute a compensable event, recent court decisions create a claimant-friendly environment. With both courts delegating the task of determining damages to the lower courts, a key issue for data breach claims remains unresolved. This article outlines an evidence-based framework for the economic analysis of data privacy damages covering market- and individual valuation. The article also assesses whether survey-based conjoint analysis can provide an empirical indication of the variation in the valuation of the data; allowing courts to assess the issue of commonality of valuation based on empirical evidence.

1. Introducti...

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Verder in dit artikel:

Quantum and class certification in data privacy mass claims after the first ECJ and BGH decisions

1. Introduction

2. Legal basis

3. Economic methods for valuation of personal data

3.1. Market prices

3.2. Financial results per data record

3.3. Individual valuation

4. Conclusion

Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Artikel
Auteurs
Claudia Lea Beckmann and Dominik Hübler1
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:MC/18498

Verder in 2024 nr.2

 Bidding Justice: A Market Approach for Governing Third-Party Litigation Funding in European Collective Actions

Collective actions function as natural monopolies. An empirical analysis of the Dutch collective action cases demonstrates that funding returns remain consistently high at around 25% regardless of ...

 "Fear and Loathing in Luxembourg"

Quantum and class certification in data privacy mass claims after the first ECJ and BGH decisions Data breaches frequently lead to mass claims. With the European Court of Justice (ECJ) finding that...

 Foreword

A wave of reforms has swept class action regimes in many parts of the world. By 2019, significant amendments were introduced in the so-called first and second generation class regimes, the United S...

 Capital Investor Model Proceedings in Germany under the revised Capital Markets Model Case Act

Capital investor model proceedings under the German Capital Markets Model Case Act are an accepted instrument of collective redress in mass disputes concerning capital investor claims. However, the...

 The Revised Class Action Regime in Belgium:

Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?[1] Belgium has had a (consumer) class action regime since 2014. The Law of 21 April 2024 implemented the 2020 Representative Actions Directive. Although the revisi...

 Public interest litigation in the Netherlands:

Developments on admissibility in class actions Public interest litigation is on the rise, especially in the Netherlands. As a result, Dutch class actions case law is undergoing significant developm...

 Country Reports

France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Portugal   France   Maria-Jose Azar-Baud  Legislation In 2020, as part of the fact-finding panel of the General Administration, Legi...