Mass Claims An international journal with a European focus 2025 nr. 1

Standing in collective environmental claims: the quest for normative consistency towards representation

Rhonson Salim1

Collective environmental claims straddle the protection of two interests - the diffused and the individual. Given the duality of interests involved, the representative element in standing criteria take on greater significance in such claims.  This article critiques the current approach towards representation in collective environmental claims before selected domestic and international courts.  The article draws on perspectives from philosophy and political science to advocate for a novel (re)conceptualisation of representation in these claims. With a new conceptual foundation established, the article proposes standing criteria which should be used to assess representation in such claims.

1. Introduction

In most forms of collective claims, the procedural rights and obligations of the claimant party is granted to an entity who acts as a representative on behalf of a group or class. Collective environmental claims involve the simultaneous protection of b...

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Verder in dit artikel:

1. Introduction

2. How should representation be conceptualised & why is it important?

2.1. What happens if responsiveness is (not?) possible?

3. Environmental claims in the international arena

4. Claims in the domestic arena

4.1. Netherlands

4.2. England

5. A Typology of Representation

6. Conclusion

Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Artikel
Auteurs
Rhonson Salim1
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:MC/18725

Verder in 2025 nr.1

 Special Edition: Collective Redress in the Age of ESG

Foreword   Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) considerations evolved from corporate buzzwords into legal, financial and ethical imperatives. Across jurisdictions, we are witnessing a...

 Does the Aarhus Convention Require an Association Action to Protect the Environment in German Private Law?

This paper examines the lack of legal standing for associations in environmental cases under German private law. Environmental claims by associations are limited to public law, while association ac...

 Financial Barriers in Environmental Collective Actions: The Role of Third-Party Litigation Funding

This paper explores if and how Third-Party Litigation Funding ("TPLF") can be used as a means to enhance access to justice in environmental collective litigation in the EU. It assesses whether envi...

 Standing in collective environmental claims: the quest for normative consistency towards representation

Collective environmental claims straddle the protection of two interests - the diffused and the individual. Given the duality of interests involved, the representative element in standing criteria ...

 Limiting Corporate Impunity through Public and Private International Law

Improving Social Sustainability through Cross-Border Public Interests Litigation The scientific community is faced with the urgent task of rethinking and deconstructing the traditional, clichéd rol...

 Trade unions and ESG obligations: a private international law perspective on the CS3D

This article looks at the role of trade unions in enforcing the Due Diligence Directive. Due to the international and extraterritorial character of the due diligence obligations of the company cove...

 Towards Collective Redress for Data Harms under the GDPR

Drawing on scholarship in informational capitalism, this paper argues that large-scale GDPR violations by Big Tech—termed 'business model violations'—generate systemic data harms that require colle...