Mass Claims An international journal with a European focus 2025 nr. 1

Country reports

England & Wales, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Scotland, Spain and Portugal

England and Wales

Anna Dannreuther and Rhea Gupta

Case law

Christine Riefa Class Representative Limited v Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc 2025 CAT 5

 

On 14 January 2025, the Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") handed down a landmark judgment refusing to grant a collective proceedings order on the grounds that the Tribunal was not satisfied that the class representative was suitable.

 

England and Wales has a comprehensive statutory regime for opt-out collective proceedings for claims for damages in competition law.1 Under this regime, collective proceedings are only permitted to proceed to trial if the CAT has granted a collective proceedings order ("CPO").2 A key condition for granting a CPO is the authorisation of the proposed class representative ("PCR");...

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Verder in dit artikel:

England & Wales, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Scotland, Spain and Portugal

England and Wales

Case law

Miscellaneous

France

Case law

Legislation

Germany

Case Law       

 Legislation

Italy

Case law

The Netherlands

Case law[100]

Scotland

Miscellaneous

Spain

Case law

Legislation

Portugal

Case law

Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Rubriek
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:MC/18729

Verder in 2025 nr.1

 Special Edition: Collective Redress in the Age of ESG

Foreword   Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) considerations evolved from corporate buzzwords into legal, financial and ethical imperatives. Across jurisdictions, we are witnessing a...

 Does the Aarhus Convention Require an Association Action to Protect the Environment in German Private Law?

This paper examines the lack of legal standing for associations in environmental cases under German private law. Environmental claims by associations are limited to public law, while association ac...

 Financial Barriers in Environmental Collective Actions: The Role of Third-Party Litigation Funding

This paper explores if and how Third-Party Litigation Funding ("TPLF") can be used as a means to enhance access to justice in environmental collective litigation in the EU. It assesses whether envi...

 Standing in collective environmental claims: the quest for normative consistency towards representation

Collective environmental claims straddle the protection of two interests - the diffused and the individual. Given the duality of interests involved, the representative element in standing criteria ...

 Limiting Corporate Impunity through Public and Private International Law

Improving Social Sustainability through Cross-Border Public Interests Litigation The scientific community is faced with the urgent task of rethinking and deconstructing the traditional, clichéd rol...

 Trade unions and ESG obligations: a private international law perspective on the CS3D

This article looks at the role of trade unions in enforcing the Due Diligence Directive. Due to the international and extraterritorial character of the due diligence obligations of the company cove...

 Towards Collective Redress for Data Harms under the GDPR

Drawing on scholarship in informational capitalism, this paper argues that large-scale GDPR violations by Big Tech—termed 'business model violations'—generate systemic data harms that require colle...