Apple Inc v Secretary of State for the Home Department: the latest iteration of the never-ending security versus privacy debate
Julian Hayes, Megan Curzon and Jenna Gayle1Artikel kopen € 79,00 excl. BTW
In plaats van abonneren kunt u dit artikel ook afzonderlijk kopen.
The precise subject matter of the legal stand-off between international tech giant Apple and the UK Home Secretary, currently before the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (``IPT") in London, is unknown. Apple is forbidden from disclosing it, the Home Secretary refuses to disclose it and, when hearing cases, the IPT itself must ensure information is not disclosed which could jeopardise national security, the prevention or detection of serious crime, the UK's economic well-being or the ongoing work of the intelligence services. From a media leak in February and a preliminary IPT ruling in April disclosing the barest of case details, we know only that Apple is challenging the Home Secretary's decision to impose a Technical Capability Notice ("TCN") requiring it to maintain the capability to remove end-to-end encryption ("E2EE") from its iCloud storage. It is Kafkaesque that something about which so little is known has caused Apple to pull its Advanced Data Protection encryption entirely...
U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.
Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.