Tijdschrift voor Staatssteun Aanbesteding, mededinging en overheid & markt 2010 nr. 1/2

Fiscal state aid and environmental protection. Analysis of a conceptual and practical problem

mr. M. Kleis and prof. mr. P.A. Nicolaides*

1. Introduction ‘The primary objective of State aid control in the field of en­vironmental protection is to ensure that State aid measu­res will result in a higher level of environmental protecti­on than would occur without the aid (...)’. This statement in the introduction of the Guidelines on State aid for Environ­mental Protection [EAG, OJ C 82, 1.4.2008, p. 1-33] seems to exclude the possibility of granting aid in the form of an exemption or reduction from

Artikel kopen € 79,00 excl. BTW

In plaats van abonneren kunt u dit artikel ook afzonderlijk kopen.

an environmental tax which, in itself, has the aim of improving the environmental protec­tion level. This is because the tax exemption or reduction, would, in principle, decrease the impact of the tax and redu­ce its beneficial effect on the environment. Yet, the EAG al­low for such measures if they fulfil certain conditions. Ob­viously, these conditions only have to be applied in cases in which the reduction or exemption in question can be quali­fied as a state aid measure. The purpose of this article is twofold. First, it explains when a tax exemption or reduction can constitute state aid in the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [TFEU]. There have been some sur­prising developments in recent jurisprudence which make it more difficult for Member States to use tax measures that do not fall within the scope of Article 107(1) TFEU. The rea­sons for this difficulty are explained in detail. Second, the article reviews the decisional practice of the Eu­ropean Commission [Commission] in order to identify the issues which are critical in its assessment of tax measures that involve state aid. As will be shown, it is also difficult for Member States to prove the compatibility of their tax measures with the rules in the EAG. The main finding of this article is that it has become harder for Member States to design tax measures that escape sta­te aid control. In addition, it is hard for measures that are found to contain state aid to pass the compatibility tests of the EAG. In other words, it is simply more difficult to use tax exemptions to protect the environment. Yet, this is not necessarily an unwelcome outcome. The rationale of tax exemptions as a means of protecting the environment has al­ways been questionable. The structure of the article is as follows. In part 2, Commis­sion decisions as well as judgements of EU courts are ana­lysed with regard to the question whether or not an envi­ronmental tax measure can be considered to be state aid. It looks at the applicability of Article 107(1) to taxation in ge­neral, and focuses especially on the definition of ‘selecti­vity’ and its consequences for tax measures. The decisio­nal practice of the Commission and the jurisprudence show, that with regard to the question whether or not a tax measure qualifies as state aid, the existence of selectivity is very of­ten the determining factor. In part 3 the article reviews the conditions under which tho­se measures which are found to be state aid can be exemp­ted. This includes a critical analysis of the justifications for allowing state aid in the form of exemptions or reduc­tions from environmental tax. Finally, in the part 4, recent Commission decisions on environmental tax reductions or exemptions are examined in order to gauge the difficulty of the task of assessing the compatibility of tax measures with the EAG.

U heeft op dit moment geen toegang tot de volledige inhoud van dit product. U kunt alleen de inleiding en hoofdstukindeling lezen.

Wanneer u volledige toegang wenst tot alle informatie kunt u zich abonneren of inloggen als abonnee.


Deel deze pagina:

Nog niet beoordeeld

Bijlage(n)

  • Bijlagen zijn alleen beschikbaar voor abonnees.

Artikel informatie

Type
Artikel
Auteurs
mr. M. Kleis and prof. mr. P.A. Nicolaides*
Auteursvermelding
Ik ben auteur van dit artikel
Datum artikel
Uniek Den Hollander publicatienummer
UDH:TvS/8797

Verder in 2010 nr.1/2

 Redactioneel

Voor u ligt het eerste nummer van het Tijdschrift voor Staatssteun (hierna: TvS). De voor­bije decennia stond de belangstelling voor het staatssteunrecht altijd wat in de schaduw van het kartelrech...

 Vijf jaar Actieplan staatssteun: wat is er bereikt en wat staat er nog open?

In juni 2005 heeft de Europese Commissie (hierna: Com­missie) het Actieplan Staatssteun (hierna: Actieplan) aange­nomen. In het Verslag over het mededingingsbeleid over het jaar 2005 zegt toenmalig...

 Het Market Economy Investor Principle: niet het middel maar het doel

Het staatssteunrecht is eigenlijk eenvoudig. Zolang er geen sprake is van staatssteun, vindt het verbod van artikel 107 lid 1 VWEU geen toepassing. Dit eenvoudige uitgangspunt leidt er echter toe d...

 Fiscal state aid and environmental protection. Analysis of a conceptual and practical problem

1. Introduction ‘The primary objective of State aid control in the field of en­vironmental protection is to ensure that State aid measu­res will result in a higher level of environmental protecti­...

 Het arrest Residex: vragen over de privaatrechtelijke gevolgen van onrechtmatige staatssteun

In het arrest Residex heeft de Hoge Raad zich voor het eerst uitgesproken over de privaatrechtelijke gevolgen van staatssteun indien deze steun is verleend in strijd met de standstill-verplichting ...

 Europese Commissie

BESLUITEN

 Actualia

■■Kamerstukken Beantwoording kamervragen financiële bijdrage gemeente Papendrecht aan Stork-fabriek, alge­mene handelingen Tweede Kamer, 2009-2010, 3123, ISSN0921-7398, 18 augustus 2010